Limited Agency Consent Agreement — Utah Edition Template

Dual agency — one brokerage (or one agent) representing both buyer and seller in the same transaction — is the most heavily regulated conflict of interest in residential real estate. A handful of states ban it outright; the rest permit it only with the informed written consent of both parties, obtained after meaningful disclosure of what the parties are giving up. Get the consent wrong and the consequences stack fast: license discipline, commission forfeiture, and rescission or damages claims grounded in breach of fiduciary duty. Courts have long treated undisclosed dual agency as a fiduciary breach that can void the broker's right to any commission.

This 4-page Informed Consent form does the disclosure properly rather than minimally. It explains in plain language what agency representation normally includes (undivided loyalty, full disclosure, advocacy on price and terms); exactly which duties are limited in dual agency (the agent cannot advocate for either side on price, cannot disclose one party's willingness to pay more or accept less, cannot share confidential negotiating positions); what duties remain intact (honesty, disclosure of material property facts, accounting, confidentiality); and the designated agency alternative where the brokerage appoints separate agents for each party, where state law permits. Both buyer and seller sign separate acknowledgment and consent blocks, with transaction-specific identification and timing language confirming consent was obtained before or at the point dual agency arose.

The 50-state notes summarize the landscape: consent-based regimes (e.g., New York's RPL § 443 disclosure form with dual agency consent), designated agency states, transaction-brokerage states that replace agency entirely, and the states where dual agency is prohibited. This template supplements — and in states with mandatory statutory forms, accompanies — the state-prescribed disclosure. Not a substitute for your state's required form where one exists.

About this Utah Edition: Every template was redrafted around the Utah Real Estate Licensing and Practices Act (Utah Code Title 61, Chapter 2f) and the Division of Real Estate's agency rules in Utah Admin. Code R162-2f, including the affirmative duties owed by every licensee, Utah's limited-agency regime (the Utah term for dual agency, which requires prior written informed consent of both parties), the Utah statute of frauds and its written-commission-agreement rule (Utah Code § 25-5-4), the Utah Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (Utah Code Title 46, Chapter 4), and the fact that Utah has no statutory seller disclosure form and no broker lien statute — so the seller disclosure is drafted as a comprehensive voluntary disclosure with the Utah Code § 57-1-37 stigmatized-property note, water rights/shares, HOA and geologic-hazard items, and commission enforcement is handled contractually. All citations are limited to those statutes; everything else is phrased generally for review by Utah counsel.